RE: [sv-champions] Champions conference call May 21st, 2009 -- agenda

Neil,

I vote 'yes' to all, except

   4. 2735  SV-EC Ballot Comment #48: Chaining of method calls
          Yes ___  No _X__  Abstain ___

      I think chaining of method calls is already legal

  35. 2593  SV-BC Omitting types in port declaration
           Yes ___  No _X__  Abstain ___

       I opened this issue, and I'm not fully satisfied with the proposal, even though I voted for it in SV-BC.  If it had been passed unanimously, or nearly so, then I would say "good enough is good enough", but actually the proposal barely passed.  Even given a moderate amount of additional time, I don't think SV-BC could come up with a proposal that would pass almost unanimously.

   50. 1256  SV-EC Minor problems in description of Linked Lists (Annex H)
          [p1800-2009 ballot comment id 192]
             Yes ___  No _X__  Abstain ___

      Would change my vote to 'yes' if Editor would agree to change 'P1800' to '1800' and remove the space in "1800- 2005".

-- Brad

________________________________________
From: owner-sv-champions@eda.org [owner-sv-champions@eda.org] On Behalf Of Neil Korpusik [Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 11:41 AM
To: sv-champions@eda.org
Subject: [sv-champions] Champions conference call May 21st, 2009 -- agenda

Hi Champions,

Below is the set of mantis items that are up for a vote by the Champions.
We will be meeting this Thursday, May 21st, 8am PST.

If you have time, it would be good if you could send out your votes before
the meeting. That way I can combine the results before the meeting starts.
That would make the meeting go quite a bit faster.

I will attempt to send another version of this later today that has more
details.

Neil



--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.