RE: [sv-champions] Champions email vote - ending May 14th

It is at the bottom of page 388, following the paragraph:

When verifying the behavior of a protocol controller that has to respond to requests on req, assertions
assert_ack1 and assert_ack2 should be proven while assuming that statements a1, assume_req1,
assume_req2, and assume_req3 hold at all times.

Thanks,
Shalom 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stuart Sutherland [mailto:stuart@sutherland-hdl.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:16 PM
> To: Bresticker, Shalom; Korchemny, Dmitry; 'Neil.Korpusik@sun.com'
> Cc: sv-champions@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-champions] Champions email vote - ending May 14th
> 
> An error in an example that is a syntax error is most 
> definitely just an
> editorial correction.  From this e-mail, however, I don't have enough
> information on exactly where the error appears so that I can 
> correct it.
> 
> Stu
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Stuart Sutherland
> stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
> (503) 692-0898
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-champions@eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-champions@eda.org] On
> > Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:05 PM
> > To: Korchemny, Dmitry; Neil.Korpusik@sun.com
> > Cc: sv-champions@eda.org
> > Subject: RE: [sv-champions] Champions email vote - ending May 14th
> > 
> > In my opinion, yes. It is essentially a typo.
> > 
> > Shalom
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Korchemny, Dmitry
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:04 PM
> > > To: Bresticker, Shalom; Neil.Korpusik@sun.com
> > > Cc: sv-champions@eda.org
> > > Subject: RE: [sv-champions] Champions email vote - ending May 14th
> > >
> > > Yes, you are right. But this typo existed already in LRM05,
> > > and was not part of the ballot issue. Could it be handled as
> > > an editorial issue then?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dmitry
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bresticker, Shalom
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:56 PM
> > > To: Neil.Korpusik@sun.com; Korchemny, Dmitry
> > > Cc: sv-champions@eda.org
> > > Subject: RE: [sv-champions] Champions email vote - ending May 14th
> > >
> > > Neil,
> > >
> > > Heads-up on the following:
> > >
> > > > 14. 2541     Yes ___ No _x_ Abstain ___
> > > >      SV-AC  syntax errors - missing parenthesis
> > >
> > > I think that parentheses are also missing near the end of 16.15.2:
> > >
> > > "a1:assume property @(posedge clk) req dist {0:=40, 1:=60} ;"
> > >
> > >
> > > Shalom
> > >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Intel Israel (74) Limited
> > 
> > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential 
> material for
> > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or 
> distribution
> > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.