In my opinion, yes. It is essentially a typo. Shalom > -----Original Message----- > From: Korchemny, Dmitry > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:04 PM > To: Bresticker, Shalom; Neil.Korpusik@sun.com > Cc: sv-champions@eda.org > Subject: RE: [sv-champions] Champions email vote - ending May 14th > > Yes, you are right. But this typo existed already in LRM05, > and was not part of the ballot issue. Could it be handled as > an editorial issue then? > > Thanks, > Dmitry > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bresticker, Shalom > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:56 PM > To: Neil.Korpusik@sun.com; Korchemny, Dmitry > Cc: sv-champions@eda.org > Subject: RE: [sv-champions] Champions email vote - ending May 14th > > Neil, > > Heads-up on the following: > > > 14. 2541 Yes ___ No _x_ Abstain ___ > > SV-AC syntax errors - missing parenthesis > > I think that parentheses are also missing near the end of 16.15.2: > > "a1:assume property @(posedge clk) req dist {0:=40, 1:=60} ;" > > > Shalom > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue May 12 12:06:07 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 12 2009 - 12:06:08 PDT