Hi Champions, This is a call for an email vote on the following mantis items. The email vote will run for 1 week, ending on Thursday May 14th, 7am (PST). We will also have a conference call the morning of May 14th, 8am (PST). Any items that don't get approved in this email vote will be discussed in that meeting. There will be more mantis items from the sv-bc, sv-cc and the sv-ec. It is my understanding that the sv-ac has completed its work already. The following set of Mantis items are currently in the resolved state: I will send an updated list later today that has links for those that like to click on a link for each item being voted on. 1. 2646 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Assumption in deferred assertion example should be made explicit 2. 2657 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Clarify notion of sequence 3. 2648 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Need an example of cyclic dependencies between sequences 4. 2649 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC sequence_actual_arg is used to represent the default argument 5. 2655 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Backward compatibility issue with the clocking specification 6. 2644 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-CC Ballot comment #153 Wrong function named in table 36.9 7. 2630 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-CC Ballot comment #168 Wrong format type named in Table 38-5 8. 2653 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Sequence match not shown in timing diagram 9. 2612 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC `true should have a backtick in a sequence example 10. 2660 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Add indices to expressions 11. 2478 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Clock flow subclause is not consistent with multiclocked property definition 12. 2661 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC "Syntax 16-19" is in blue. 13. 2659 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Backward compatibility issue with sequence property 14. 2541 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC syntax errors - missing parenthesis 15. 2516 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Another contradiction of existing text with 2398 needs to be fixed 16. 2496 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC non_port_program_item should contain assertion_item 17. 1775 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-CC cbAtEndOfSimTime not in header files 18. 2576 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-CC Failed to remove reference to Reader API when deprecating Data Read API 19. 2621 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-CC Ballot comment #155 vpiSize should return an error when applied on a vpiFunction returning string 20. 2623 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-CC Ballot comment #157 vpiArrayType is labelled bool, should be int 21. 2626 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-CC Ballot comment #162 In Table 38-3 in vpiScalarVal, vpi1 et al should be in bold 22. 2631 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-CC Ballot comment #172 The usage of the the term PLI is confusing 23. 2637 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-CC Ballot comment #146 Term PLI is confusing 24. 2628 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-CC Ballot comment #164 In Arguments section, s_vpi_arrayvalue should be p_vpi_arrayvalue. 25. 2717 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Ballot comment #81 Clarification needed for the usage of severity tasks. 26. 2647 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Clarification about clock glitches in concurrent assertions 27. 2656 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Clarify difference of $global_clock handling in simulation and formal verification 28. 2658 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Default values for untyped formals 29. 2654 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Error in an example of throughout operator 30. 2642 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Ballot comment #151 Need a similar rule for disabled SystemVerilog functions in section 9.6.2 31. 2643 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Ballot comment #152 Section implies that a SystemVerilog function cannot be disabled 32. 2680 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Ballot comment #32: Writing to an array with an invalid index 33. 2513 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC BNF needs fixes to allow checkers in packages 34. 2542 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Config declaration BNF bug 35. 2550 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC static variable initialization example has error 36. 2634 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Ballot comment #20 Wording of paragraph implies evaluation 37. 2672 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Ballot Comment #Macro expansion example incorrect in 22.5.1 38. 2683 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Ballot comment #66: Example mislabelled "delay control" instead of "event control" 39. 2695 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Ballot comment #169: BNF error in edge_sensitive_path_declaration 40. 2652 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Future value functions need clarification 41. 2562 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC rand qualifier for checker variables is not reflected in BNF 42. 2650 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Ambiguity in a sequence repetition [*0] definition 43. 2670 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Ballot Comment #130: Module header description is missing the package import list in 23.2.1 44. 2675 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Ballot Comment #103: Clarification of readmem warning 45. 2676 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Ballot comment #28: port connection warning 46. 1492 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Overriding default lifetime of subroutine formal arguments 47. 2625 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-CC Ballot comment #161 There is a blue change bar at the bottom of the page. 48. 2622 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-CC Ballot comment #156 Arrow missing in VPI Generate diagram 49. 2629 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-CC Ballot comment #167 Function "vpi_get64" should be "vpi_get_long()" 50. 2627 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-CC Ballot comment #163 In Tables 38-3 and 38-5, for decimal characters, "0-9" should be in bold, for consistency. The following list have been resolved by the SV-ec, but the mantis items have not yet been moved to the resolved state. They will be placed into the resolved state today. 51. 2632 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-cc id 16 approved email May 1 2009 52. 2633 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-cc id 17 approved email May 1 2009 53. 2705 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 35 approved email May 1 2009 54. 2700 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 36,39,40 approved email May 1 2009 55. 2682 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 42 approved email May 1 2009 56. 2430 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 43 approved email May 1 2009 57. 2701 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 44 approved, may 4 2009 meeting 58. 2430 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 45 approved email May 1 2009 59. 2706 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 46 approved email May 1 2009 60. 2713 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 47 approved, may 4 2009 meeting 61. 2719 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 58 approved email May 1 2009 62. 2358 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 67 approved, may 4 2009 meeting [ with spelling correction] 63. 2596 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 80 approved email May 1 2009 64. 2710 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 106 approved email May 1 2009 65. 2711 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 107 approved may 4 2009, 6 Yes, 3Abstains, 3 No Votes 66. 2719 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 117 approved email May 1 2009 67. 2719 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 118 approved email May 1 2009 68. 2719 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 119 approved email May 1 2009 69. 2543 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id approved in may 4 2009 meeting 70. 2035 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 181 approved on may 4 2009 with 2 abstains 71. 2473 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-ec id 184 approved email May 1 2009 (no action taken) Neil -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu May 7 07:18:27 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 07 2009 - 07:18:31 PDT