RE: [sv-champions] Mantis 1900 Part 1 - Editorial comments

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Mon Aug 04 2008 - 07:31:27 PDT
A few more:
 
assertion_item is added to A.1.8. I think the proper place for it is
A.6.10.
 
The proposal says to add checker_identifier in A.9.3 at the end. It
should be placed in alphabetical order.
 
There is a superscript footnote 2 at checker_generate_item in A.1.8. At
the end of Annex A, it is numbered as 1. It needs to be clear that they
are referring to each other.
 
In Part 2, on page 4, in Syntax 17-2, the comment "// from A.9.3" is
attached to named_checker_port_connection. It should be on
"checker_identifier".
 
Thanks,
Shalom


________________________________

	From: owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker,
Shalom
	Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 5:15 PM
	To: sv-sc@server.eda.org
	Cc: sv-champions@server.eda.org
	Subject: RE: [sv-champions] Mantis 1900 Part 1 - Editorial
comments
	
	
	A couple of BNF items:
	 
	The changes to Annex A list the addition of checker_declaration
twice, both in A.1.2 and in A.1.8. For consistency with the rest of the
BNF, A.1.2 appears to be the proper place.
	 
	The change to procedural_assertion_statement appears under
A.6.2. However, that is actually found in A.6.10.
	 
	Regards,
	Shalom


________________________________

		From: owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker,
Shalom
		Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 5:01 PM
		To: sv-sc@server.eda.org
		Cc: sv-champions@server.eda.org
		Subject: [sv-champions] Mantis 1900 Part 1 - Editorial
comments
		
		

		Hi, 

		Looking at file 1900_checkers_part1_080718_dk.pdf, I saw
a few minor items. 

		At the top of page 4: 

		Clause 17 describes checkers. Checkers. Checkers allow
the encapsulation of assertions and modeling code 
		to create a single verification entity. 

		"Checkers" makes a redundant appearance. 


		On page 11, in the change to Syntax 16-16, the new
"concurrent_assertion_item" should have a comment "// from A.2.10" 


		The change in 16.15.5 needs to be coordinated with
Mantis 2398. They are not completely consistent. 


		In the dashed list at the beginning of 22.9, "Checkers"
should be placed after "Programs", like everywhere else. 


		checker and endchecker need to be added to Table 21-5. 

		Thanks, 
		Shalom 

		Shalom Bresticker 
		Intel Jerusalem LAD DA 
		+972 2 589-6582 
		+972 54 721-1033 

	
---------------------------------------------------------------------
		Intel Israel (74) Limited
		
		This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
material for
		the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or
distribution
		by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended
		recipient, please contact the sender and delete all
copies.

		-- 
		This message has been scanned for viruses and 
		dangerous content by MailScanner
<http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is 
		believed to be clean. 

	
---------------------------------------------------------------------
	Intel Israel (74) Limited
	
	This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
material for
	the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or
distribution
	by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
	recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

	-- 
	This message has been scanned for viruses and 
	dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>
, and is 
	believed to be clean. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Aug 4 07:35:00 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 07:35:02 PDT