RE: [sv-champions] comments on 2415

Because .triggered is already used for events

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-
> champions@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 6:53 AM
> To: sv-champions@server.eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-champions] comments on 2415
> 
> Yes, the initial suggestion was to deprecate .triggered
> 
>    http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-sc/hm/0245.html
> 
> -- Brad
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-champions@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-champions@eda.org]
On
> Behalf Of John Havlicek
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:32 PM
> To: sv-champions@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-champions] comments on 2415
> 
> Out of curiosity, why was deprecating "ended" favored over
> deprecating "triggered"?  We are chucking the shorter one in favor
> of the longer.
> 
> It would be a good idea to enter a mantis item for the next PAR to
> update
> 
>    A sequence treats its formal argument as a local variable if the
>    formal argument is used as an lvalue in operator_assignment or
>    inc_or_dec_expression in sequence_match_item.
> 
> to include local variable formal arguments.  (Editorial: some
> indefinite articles seem to be missing.)  I guess that this
> restriction could also be reviewed for relaxation if the actuals
> involve only statics.
> 
> J.H.
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.