Thanks Shalom, I lost track of the email thread on 2269. Now that you pointed this out, I do see the full thread on 2269. It appears that the concerns have been addressed. As you know, 2173, 2326, 2327 were removed from the list being considered by the sv-sc. Neil Bresticker, Shalom wrote: > > > 2269: Stu sent a mail to SV-BC on April 2: > "I accept the arguments given by Shalom and Steven, and withdraw my > objections to the proposal. What I consider most important is the LRM > specify a non-ambiguous behavior, which I feel this proposal does." > > 2173, 2326, 2327: While Erik may have requested that the new > sub-committee review these as well, I don't think they are related to > checkers. Was it Erik's personal request or an SV-AC request? Whose has > the authority to send issues to the new sub-committee? > > Thanks, > Shalom > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Israel (74) Limited > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Apr 7 18:19:29 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 07 2008 - 18:19:31 PDT