Hi, I don't object to the clarifications, but neither of the quoted texts are new or changed, they both are in the current LRM. Shalom > 8. 2106 Yes ___ No _X__ Abstain ___ > SV-BC Clarifications needed for declaration before > use of objects > and type > friendly amendment: > The word instantiated for a data type is not proper. We > should probably replace " This can then be instantiated as follows:" > "The named data type can then be used as follows" > > Need clarification for the following sentence: Does this > imply anything on variables declared inside a fork block? > > "The lifetime of a fork...join, fork...join_any, or > fork...join_none block shall encompass the execution of all > processes spawned by the block." --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Feb 24 00:47:55 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 24 2008 - 00:47:58 PST