Mantis 1648 adds the following in 16.15: Furthermore, the default extends to any nested module, interface, or program declarations. I think that sentence should include nested generate blocks as well. The effect of a default disable iff item is independent of the position of the declaration within that scope. For consistency, I think "item" should be "declaration" here. Declaring more than one default disable iff item within the same module, interface, program declaration, or generate scope shall be an error. I think 'generate scope' should be 'generate block'. // Disable condition is rst - no explicit specification, inferred from // default disable statement I think the 2nd line of the comment should be // default disable iff declaration Shalom Shalom Bresticker Intel Jerusalem LAD DA +972 2 589-6582 +972 54 721-1033 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Jan 17 07:24:57 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 17 2008 - 07:25:00 PST