Neil, Here are my votes: SV-AC Mantis items passed by the Champions after making friendly ammendments Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1550 Friendly ammendments added, approved by svac My vote is Yes with two friendly amendments suggested: 1. All references to "preponed" should be "Preponed". This is to make the capitalization of event region names consistent with a change made by the SV-EC in another Mantis item, already incorporated in draft 3a. 2. The changes to clause 16.8.3 add in two places new text describing that $sampled returns default uninitialized values under certain conditions. I recommend that these two new descriptions end with a cross reference: "(see 6.7, Table 6-1)". [clause and table numbers per draft 3a] Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1567 Friendly ammendments added, approved by svac Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1722 Friendly ammendments added, approved by svac SV-AC Mantis items sent back to the committees for updates: Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1591 Revised, passed by email ballot 7y/0n/2a Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1601 Revised, passed by email ballot 8y/0n/1a Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1704 Revised, passed by email ballot 8y/0n/1a Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1729 Revised, passed by email ballot 7y/0n/2a Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1768 Reviewed by LP, DB, JH., no change needed SV-AC Mantis items rejected by the Champions Yes ___ No ___ Abstain _X_ 1466 Revised, passed by e-mail ballot 6y/0n/3a I abstain on this item because I feel the change is unnecessary. It does not add new functionality, and only makes assertion sequences even more cryptic. If I had had voting privileges on the AC committee, I would have voted against this enhancement. I would vote against it if I had voting privileges at the P1800 working group level. I do not feel it is appropriate to vote NO on this at the champions level, because the champions charter is different. SV-EC Mantis items passed by the Champions after making friendly ammendments Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1789 Friendly ammendments were added SV-EC Mantis items sent back to the sv-ec for updates and further review Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1787 changes by the Champions were made Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1777 changes by the Champions were made Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1736 changes by the Champions were made Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1723 changes by the Champions were made Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1680 changes by the Champions were made Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1655 changes by the Champions were made Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1615 changes by the Champions were made Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1612 changes by the Champions were made Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1609 changes by the Champions were made Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1605 changes by the Champions were made Yes ___ No _X_ Abstain ___ 1556 no changes were needed I vote no because the e-mail discussion from other champions leads me to believe that the proposal needs further analysis from the SV-EC. Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1545 section numbers were updated Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1480 no changes were needed Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1427 section numbers were updated Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1371 no changes were required Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 1336 section numbers were updated Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 888 section numbers were updated Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ 594 section numbers were updated Stu ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Stuart Sutherland Sutherland HDL, Inc. stuart@sutherland-hdl.com 503-692-0898 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org > [mailto:owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Neil Korpusik > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:22 PM > To: sv-champions@server.eda.org > Subject: [sv-champions] 5-day email vote - reminder - closes aug 29 > > Champions, > > This is a reminder that our 5-day email vote ends tomorrow at 5pm PST. > > Neil > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [sv-champions] 5-day email vote > Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:06:10 -0700 > From: Neil Korpusik <Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM> > Reply-To: Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM > To: undisclosed-recipients: ; > > The details are attached. > Please vote as early as possible. > > Thanks, > Neil > > > > Champions, > > Thank you for agreeing to hold a 5-day email vote. > Below is the list of mantis items that we are voting on. > > Each of these was on the agenda in one of the previous 3 > Champions meetings. > The Champions made friendly ammendments for some of them. > Others were sent > back to the committees for updates or further review. There > was one that > was rejected by the Champions. The technical committees have > made changes > in response to the Champions feedback and would like to have > the Champions > re-vote them. > > Please mark each mantis item with your vote. > If you vote no, you must provide a reason. > I would like you to also provide a reason if you decide to abstain. > > > ***> This email vote will end at 5pm PST, Aug 29 <*** > > SV-AC Mantis items passed by the Champions after making > friendly ammendments > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1550 Friendly ammendments > added, approved by svac > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1567 Friendly ammendments > added, approved by svac > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1722 Friendly ammendments > added, approved by svac > > SV-AC Mantis items sent back to the committees for updates: > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1591 Revised, passed by email > ballot 7y/0n/2a > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1601 Revised, passed by email > ballot 8y/0n/1a > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1704 Revised, passed by email > ballot 8y/0n/1a > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1729 Revised, passed by email > ballot 7y/0n/2a > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1768 Reviewed by LP, DB, JH., > no change needed > > SV-AC Mantis items rejected by the Champions > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1466 Revised, passed by e-mail > ballot 6y/0n/3a > > SV-EC Mantis items passed by the Champions after making > friendly ammendments > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1789 Friendly ammendments were added > > SV-EC Mantis items sent back to the sv-ec for updates and > further review > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1787 changes by the Champions were made > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1777 changes by the Champions were made > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1736 changes by the Champions were made > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1723 changes by the Champions were made > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1680 changes by the Champions were made > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1655 changes by the Champions were made > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1615 changes by the Champions were made > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1612 changes by the Champions were made > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1609 changes by the Champions were made > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1605 changes by the Champions were made > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1580 changes by the Champions were made > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1556 no changes were needed > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1545 section numbers were updated > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1480 no changes were needed > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1427 section numbers were updated > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1371 no changes were required > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 1336 section numbers were updated > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 888 section numbers were updated > Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ 594 section numbers were updated > > > > > > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Aug 29 14:38:56 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 29 2007 - 14:38:58 PDT