RE: [sv-champions] 5-day email vote 1723

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Tue Aug 28 2007 - 04:00:35 PDT
I agree with Dave on this one.

Shalom 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Rich, Dave
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 9:40 AM
> To: Brad Pierce; sv-champions@server.eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-champions] 5-day email vote 1723
> 
> > 
> >     http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=1723
> > 
> >         6) Needs an example of the new method.
> [DR] This would be another mantis item.
> > 
> >         7) Not clear that that the indexing expressions are still
> legal
> > after the change from [*] to [int].
> > 
> [DR]From the LRM 7.9.4 Integer (or int) index
> - Indices can be any integral expression.
> - Indices are signed.
> - A 4-state index containing X or Z is invalid.
> - Indices smaller than integer are sign extended to 32 bits.
> - Indices larger than integer are truncated to 32 bits.
> - The ordering is signed numerical.
> 
> 
> What's not legal?
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Aug 28 04:02:22 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 28 2007 - 04:02:23 PDT