Also, the intransitive "will increment" is inconsistent with the rest of the paragraph that says bins are "incremented". And, it's a little odd that it says "Next, ..." regarding what happens on the 15th-18th samples, and only after that talks about what happens on the 12th-13th samples. -- Brad -----Original Message----- From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2007 11:32 AM To: Brad Pierce; sv-champions@eda.org Cc: Mehdi Mohtashemi Subject: RE: [sv-champions] Meeting reminder - August 15th 9am PST The proposal for 1777 is not updated to Draft 3a. It refers to 18.4.1 in 1800-2005, which is apparently 18.5.1 in Draft 3a. The struck-out text starts with "The goto repetition with nonconsecutive occurrence", but I don't see the word "goto" in the original. I don't know if there are other differences. The capitalization of 'goto' in the proposal is inconsistent. In Draft 3a, it seems to be consistently uncapitalized. Shalom > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org > [mailto:owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 3:09 AM > To: sv-champions@server.eda.org > Subject: RE: [sv-champions] Meeting reminder - August 15th 9am PST > > Attached is an HTML version of Neil's list. > > -- Brad > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Aug 12 16:15:27 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 12 2007 - 16:15:29 PDT