RE: [sv-champions] Ballot review process

Spreadsheets are really inconvenient.
For 1364-2001, we received the original comments from the reviewers in email
form. 

Can we request the balloters to send us a copy of their comments in that
form?

Shalom


On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Karen Pieper wrote:

> Comments below:
> 
> At 10:46 AM 3/4/2005 -0800, you wrote:
> >Bounced mail from Dave Rich:
> >
> >
> >>Karen,
> >>
> >>In what form with the feedback from the ballot come to the champions?
> >>Will it already be entered in a database created from the ballot
> >>process?
> 
> All balloting feedback comes back from the IEEE in the form of a spreadsheet.  The Champions will start with that.  We can choose to enter it into a database first thing if we choose.
> 
> >>
> >>Given that the committees have been discouraged to discuss any issues
> >>during the ballot (even though a few issues have leaked out), plus
> >>having some idea of the comments Mentor Graphics plans to submit, I
> >>think the two week period for the committees to deal with all issues
> >>raised is unreasonable. Two months would be more realistic.
> 
> I've raised this issue with Johny.
> 
> 
> >>Dave
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: owner-sv-champions@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-champions@eda.org]
> >>On
> >>> Behalf Of Karen Pieper
> >>> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 10:10 AM
> >>> To: sv-champions@eda.org
> >>> Subject: [sv-champions] Ballot review process
> >>> 
> >>> Hi, Champions,
> >>> 
> >>>       As Champions, a significant role has been given to you in the
> >>> balloting review process.  The P1800 WG recommends some face-to-face
> >>> meetings in the schedule below.  I'd like to hear everyone's opinions
> >>as
> >>> to how long a meeting we think we'll need to start the process of
> >>> reviewing balloting feedback.  Note that I've already seen some
> >>> significant commentary that is being forwarded to the registered
> >>voters.
> >>> 
> >>> Note that I have yet to receive any official feedback.  Would we like
> >>to
> >>> plan to meet in case some comes in before the end of the balloting?
> >>> 
> >>> The schedule:
> >>> 
> >>> February 22:  The balloting process opens.  As feedback is filed with
> >>> the IEEE, it will be forwarded
> >>>       to Johny, and he is likely to forward it on to me and the
> >>Champions
> >>> for preliminary processing
> >>>       into buckets (see March 28 below).
> >>> 
> >>> March 24:     The ballot closes.
> >>> 
> >>> March 28:     P1800 will receive the accumulated feedback filed with
> >>the
> >>> balloting.
> >>>       This feedback will be given to the Champions to sort into
> >>several
> >>> buckets:
> >>> 
> >>>       1)  Issues that may require substantive changes to the LRM are
> >>> forwarded to the SV-* committees
> >>>       2)  Issues that are editorial changes will be forwarded to Stu
> >>>       3)  Issues that are "not a bug" are commented on appropriately
> >>and
> >>> passed back to the P1800
> >>> 
> >>>       The P1800 recommends that the champions have a face-to-face all
> >>day
> >>> meeting to complete
> >>>       this process.
> >>> 
> >>> March 31:  The Champions are complete with their initial
> >>classification
> >>> and assignment of issues to
> >>>       committees.
> >>> 
> >>>       The P1800 recommends that the SV-* committees plan an all day
> >>face-
> >>> to-face to deal with the
> >>>       issues raised.  Possible resolutions are:
> >>> 
> >>>       1)  Changes are made to the LRM to address the issue
> >>>       2)  Addressing the issue is determined to decrease consensus in
> >>the
> >>> committee is so noted on
> >>>               the issues spreadsheet.
> >>>       3)  Other determination of the issue is made and is also so
> >>noted in
> >>> the issues spreadsheet
> >>>               Note:  Saying that an issue will be delayed to a future
> >>> release is not an allowed response.
> >>> 
> >>> April 12:  The committees are complete with their LRM updates and
> >>issue
> >>> spreadsheet updates.
> >>> 
> >>>       The Champions will meet, do their review of LRM changes looking
> >>for
> >>> inconsistency, etc.
> >>>       This is likely to be a phone meeting.
> >>> 
> >>> April 15:  The Champions have completed their analysis and the data is
> >>> forwarded to the P1800.
> >>> 
> >>> April 19:  The P1800 has a WG meeting in Austin to approve the changes
> >>and
> >>> responses.
> >>> 
> >>> May 3:  The updated draft is ready for editorial review of the changes
> >>> 
> >>> May 9:  The re-ballot draft is complete
> >>> 
> >>> May 10:  Voting on the re-ballot draft starts.
> >>> 
> >>> I'd appreciate your insights into how best accomplish the Champions
> >>piece
> >>> to this process.
> >>> 
> >>> Karen
> 
> 

-- 
Shalom Bresticker                        Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com
Design & Verification Methodology                    Tel: +972 9  9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 9  9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972 50 5441478
  
[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary