[sv-champions] Champions issues review comments

Many of the proposals only provide the pdf or html, no source (framemaker or
doc file is provided).
I thought we needed to provide both for the editor
 
 
41: dup of 169. The text in the proposal for 169 states:
"In A.2.7 and Syntax 10-1, as amended by erratum 168, REPLACE"
This is not 168, this is 169.
 
265: the framemaker source file is missing, only pdf is provided
 
77: is not a duplicate anymore of 53, it was reopened on Monday and voted on
by email, Charles should
      have the results today.
 
155: check should be removed from the index, I don't understand why this was
qualified as not a bug, I
       do agree with the proposal.
 
215: This errata should be brought up to the 1800 WG as it will create
incompatiblity with how variable initialization
currently work in 1364. Some customer designs will not work anymore as in
systemVerilog a variable initialization
does not create an event.
 
275: The editor may be confused by the way the proposal is formulated. There
are " if issue 1 and 2 are approved..."
in the proposal. Arturo may need to send a clear proposal without the
discussion around it.
 
334: The proposal states:"An attempt to embbed a 0-valued character in the
string shall be considered an outof-

bounds access."

Friendly amendment: This could be rewritten as:

An attempt to embbed a 0-valued character in the string shall be considered
an out-of-

bounds value write access.
Received on Tue Dec 21 08:25:40 2004