RE: Email vote due Monday July 16th

From: Steven Sharp <sharp@cadence.com>
Date: Sat Jul 14 2012 - 19:18:29 PDT

2559: YES

4144: NO

The statement about the number of combinations of {s, d} needs to be clear that it is only talking about combinations where the constraint c is true. Otherwise it is wrong.

3525: ABSTAIN

I don't know enough about it to comment. I do note an editorial issue with the proposal. In the productions for property_declaration, the red crossed-out property_statement_spec has a crossed-out semicolon that was not present in the quoted original text. This could confuse the editor.

4128: YES

3879: YES

This proposal does call attention to the fact that the LRM refers to triggered as a "property" of an event (which it really isn't), while referring to triggered as a "method" of a sequence, which makes more sense.

From: owner-sv-xc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-xc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Rich, Dave
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:59 PM
To: sv-xc@eda.org
Subject: Email vote due Monday July 16th

Please respond by Monday, July 16th at 9:00am PDT
ID<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view_all_set.php?sort=id&dir=DESC&type=2>

Type<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view_all_set.php?sort=custom_Type&dir=DESC&type=2>

Category<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view_all_set.php?sort=category&dir=DESC&type=2>

Summary<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view_all_set.php?sort=summary&dir=DESC&type=2>

0002559<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2559>

Errata

SV-EC

2012 Ballot comments 22,33: Wrong LRM example in section 9.7

0004144<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=4144>

Errata

SV-EC

2012 Ballot comments 16 & 17. Probability in 18.5.10 not correct

0003525<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3525>

Errata

SV-AC

2012 Ballot comment 41: property_statement should not be part of property_expr

0004128<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=4128>

Errata

SV-EC

2012 Ballot comment 49: Global constants should be allowed as variables in a covergroup_expression

0003879<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3879>

Clarification

SV-AC

2012 Ballot comment 40: Return value of sequence methods should be well-defined

Dave Rich
Verification Technologist
Mentor Graphics Corporation
[cid:image001.png@01CD61FC.EE2CAAD0]<http://www.twitter.com/dave_59>[cid:image002.png@01CD61FC.EE2CAAD0]<http://go.mentor.com/drich>

image001.png
image002.png
Received on Sat Jul 14 19:18:39 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jul 14 2012 - 19:18:40 PDT