Date: Fri Jul 13 2012 - 08:25:52 PDT
Thanks Jim,
We said we would accept the vote if the change was made before anyone voted and anyone who voted earlier resubmits their vote. Brad is the only other voter so far.
Dave
Mentor Graphics
From: Jim Vellenga [mailto:vellenga@cadence.com]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 7:52 AM
To: Rich, Dave; sv-xc@eda.org
Subject: RE: Email vote due Monday July 16th
2559 -- I am in favor of the proposal uploaded on July 11, but since it lacks the 1-week notice, I believe we have to vote on it again.
4144 -- Disapproved. The change to the first paragraph is clean, but the proposed change to the second paragraph is still inaccurate.
3525 -- Abstain (no objection)
4128 -- Approved, although noting Brad's objection
3879 -- Approved
Jim Vellenga
From: owner-sv-xc@eda.org<mailto:owner-sv-xc@eda.org> [mailto:owner-sv-xc@eda.org]<mailto:[mailto:owner-sv-xc@eda.org]> On Behalf Of Rich, Dave
Sent: Tuesday, 10 Jul 2012 12:59 PM
To: sv-xc@eda.org<mailto:sv-xc@eda.org>
Subject: Email vote due Monday July 16th
Please respond by Monday, July 16th at 9:00am PDT
ID<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view_all_set.php?sort=id&dir=DESC&type=2>
Type<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view_all_set.php?sort=custom_Type&dir=DESC&type=2>
Category<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view_all_set.php?sort=category&dir=DESC&type=2>
Summary<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view_all_set.php?sort=summary&dir=DESC&type=2>
0002559<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2559>
Errata
SV-EC
2012 Ballot comments 22,33: Wrong LRM example in section 9.7
0004144<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=4144>
Errata
SV-EC
2012 Ballot comments 16 & 17. Probability in 18.5.10 not correct
0003525<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3525>
Errata
SV-AC
2012 Ballot comment 41: property_statement should not be part of property_expr
0004128<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=4128>
Errata
SV-EC
2012 Ballot comment 49: Global constants should be allowed as variables in a covergroup_expression
0003879<http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3879>
Clarification
SV-AC
2012 Ballot comment 40: Return value of sequence methods should be well-defined
Dave Rich
Verification Technologist
Mentor Graphics Corporation
[Description: Description: Twitter-32]<http://www.twitter.com/dave_59>[Description: Description: Technorati-32]<http://go.mentor.com/drich>
