RE: Emailing: P1800-2012 Ballot1 Comments.xlsx

Hi Dave,

Items i-18, i-19, and i-20 should belong to SV-AC, but they are owned by SV-EC in the spreadsheet.

Thanks,
Dmitry

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-xc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-xc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Rich, Dave
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 17:39
To: sv-xc@eda.org
Subject: RE: Emailing: P1800-2012 Ballot1 Comments.xlsx

It's because of the way the entity voted.

What I said does not mean that they will not get a response. In the past, we have responded to all comments with an agree or disagree for the current revision of the standard.

Dave
Mentor Graphics

-----Original Message-----
From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 2:32 AM
To: Rich, Dave; sv-xc@eda.org
Subject: RE: Emailing: P1800-2012 Ballot1 Comments.xlsx

Also:

Why do 'General' comments not require a response? (Most, if not all, could just as easily have been classified as Editorial)

Regarding i-13, on 'variation', Mantis 1850 should be looked at.

Regards,
Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bresticker, Shalom
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 10:35 AM
> To: Rich, Dave; sv-xc@eda.org
> Subject: RE: Emailing: P1800-2012 Ballot1 Comments.xlsx
>
> Hi,
>
> I just glanced at the comment list.
>
> I saw two more duplicates:
>
> 1. i-19 and i-20 are the same issue in two places. i-39 is one comment
> that mentions both places. i-19 and i-39 are already listed as
> duplicates. i-20 should be added.
>
> 2. i-26 and i-31 are the same issue. The correct Mantis reference is
> 2867, not 2687.
>
> Also, i-34 and i-35 can be considered together. Brad has already
> created a proposal that handles both.
>
> Regards,
> Shalom
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-xc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-xc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> > Rich, Dave
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 4:05 AM
> > To: sv-xc@eda.org
> > Subject: Emailing: P1800-2012 Ballot1 Comments.xlsx
> >
> > Here is the list of P1800-2012 First ballot comments with the
> specific
> > entity information removed.
> >
> > Some statistics:
> >
> > 30 Technical (+3 duplicates)
> > 17 Editorial (+1 duplicate)
> > 9 General (does not require a response)
> >
> > 61 total ballot comments

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.