RE: Survey - Version 0.2

Hi Kevin, 

Thanks for quick response. My comments below. 

Logie.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Cameron [mailto:kevin@sonicsinc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:54 PM
To: Logie Ramachandran
Cc: sv-xc@eda.org
Subject: Re: Survey - Version 0.2

Logie Ramachandran wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I have incorporated the feedback and created Version 0.2 of 
> survey. Please give it a last minute read, and we can send it out
> if there is no major changes proposed in the next 2 days. 
>   
I still don't think it's clear whether you talking about a single 
simulator/vendor environment or multiple tools from different vendors 
talking to each other.

LOGIE>> I assume that you are talking about 1.4. This was the wording
LOGIE>> we agreed to in the meeting. Can you propose changes to 
LOGIE>> the current wording

LOGIE>>  1.4      In the context of interoperability, is it important to

LOGIE>>           have the capability to cosimulate multiple simulators
LOGIE>>           (supporting different languages) from different
vendors?
          



Also, we have the issue that we currently have to generate models for 
multiple SystemC environments (different headers/compilers), and would 
much rather be able to ship a single object file that was usable with 
multiple SystemC environments (as well as SV). So maybe a question or 
two about interoperability of versions for compiled IP would be useful.

LOGIE>>  I am concerned that we are expanding the scope of the survey
LOGIE>>  beyond what was original discussed. This question mainly 
LOGIE>>  addresses the compatibility of SystemC versions as it pertains
LOGIE>>  to a compiler  (gcc version x).
 
Kev.

> Somdipta, do you want to attempt changing the format to 
> Excel? 
>
> Thanks
>
> Logie. 
>
>
> --------------------------------
> Loganath Ramachandran   
> Director, R&D
> Verification Group,      
> Synopsys
> Mountain View, CA 94043
>
> Ph: 650-584-4891
> Em: logie@synopsys.com
>
>   
 >snip<

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.