Hi NSS, I was wondering whether 3.16 and 3.17 are within the scope of this committee. Dont these scenarios need extensions to VHDL. Thanks Logie. -----Original Message----- From: N.S. Subramanian [mailto:subns@cadence.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:25 PM To: Logie Ramachandran Cc: N.S. Subramanian Subject: RE: Survey Questionnaire: Draft version Logie, I had some additional survey questions for the VHDL section: 3.16 Would you like to extend SystemVerilog bind to create SV module/interface instances in VHDL blocks and instances? 3.17 Would you like to be able to pass SystemVerilog interfaces to VHDL through port connections ? thanks and regards, nss -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-xc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-xc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Logie Ramachandran Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 11:12 PM To: arnab_saha@mentor.com; John Shields; Kathy McKinley; Amit Kohli; Roy, Somdipta Basu; Ulrich Holtmann Cc: sv-xc@eda.org Subject: Survey Questionnaire: Draft version Hi Team, This took much longer than I expected. I have put together the combined questionnaire making sure that we get a consistent look and feel across the sections. I have merged the DPI questions into the SystemC and VHDL section. I have also tried to keep this as a txt file so that it can be parsed by a script easily. Please review the sections and make sure that I have captured all the feedback so far. Suggest any changes in format/questions over email. Thanks Logie. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Feb 12 10:17:06 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 12 2007 - 10:17:07 PST