RE: Survey Questionnaire: Draft version

This is regarding 3.14.1. I would also like to add the case of extending
DPI for
Verilog-VPI callback functions. This is a VHDL section, but I think we
can put in
Verilog-VPI as well:

"Extend DPI export to enable them to be called from VHDL-VHPI or
Verilog-VPI 
callback functions"

Regards,

--Amit 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-xc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-xc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Amit
Kohli
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:32 PM
To: Logie Ramachandran; arnab_saha@mentor.com; John Shields; Kathy
McKinley; Roy, Somdipta Basu; Ulrich Holtmann
Cc: sv-xc@eda.org
Subject: RE: Survey Questionnaire: Draft version


I would like to re-phrase 2.4.2 as:

"Allow static methods of a SystemVerilog class to be declared  as export
DPI  functions, so that they can be called from any C++ domain" 

-----Original Message-----
From: Logie Ramachandran [mailto:Logie.Ramachandran@synopsys.com]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 11:12 PM
To: arnab_saha@mentor.com; John Shields; Kathy McKinley; Amit Kohli;
Roy, Somdipta Basu; Ulrich Holtmann
Cc: sv-xc@eda.org
Subject: Survey Questionnaire: Draft version 

Hi Team,

This took much longer than I expected. I have put together the combined
questionnaire making sure that we get a consistent look and feel across
the sections. 
I have merged the DPI questions into the SystemC and VHDL section.  

I have also tried to keep this as a txt file so that it can be parsed by
a script easily. 

Please review the sections and make sure that I have captured all the
feedback so far. Suggest any changes in format/questions over email. 

Thanks

Logie. 

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.