I had submitted a response to a survey / questionnaire regarding different requirements for the SC - SV interoperability. I seem to have misplaced the response from the group asking for further input. At Sonics, I am sure there are many others too, we will be having a need for our SV testbench to work with SC TLMs (could be timed or untimed) and RTL HDL. Our testbench requirement is that we will use the same testbench to test either model with out having to make significant modifications to either the testbench or the model being verified. We want to generate a transaction that can be passed through an interface (some type of channel). This channel type could be used to communicate with SC TLMs, a reference model in either SC or C/C++ or a SV transactor (BFM). It might be facilitated via some common data types that both languages would natively understand with out the need user developed adaptors or "support" code. With the ever, increasing use of mixed language models in simulation and testbench environments, many users will be faced with the burden of writing their own "transformation" code and connecting it through some type of language interface. Both of which are opportunities for performance loss and errors which greatly reduce re-usability and productivity. Regards, Don -- Don Ticarich Sonics Inc. Sr. Verification Engineer 1098 Alta Ave. Email: dont@sonicsinc.com Suite 101 Phone: 650.605.6127 Mountain View, CA 94043 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jan 30 09:15:15 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 30 2007 - 09:15:16 PST