P1800 Working Group,
Below are the results of the Champion's email vote which ended on
June 11, 2011. There were 8 others that were sent back to the technical
committees (not shown in this list). One of those passed with friendly
amendments and two others require some additional clarification.
We would like to get approval for those Mantis items that have been approved
by both the Technical Committees and the Champions. A summary of the Mantis
items is shown in the attachment.
All of these resolutions were unanimously approved by both the Champions
and the Technical Committees (except for items 27,28,29).
5 of 7 Champions participated in this email vote.
John is currently on a leave and Dave was at DAC.
Neil
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
P1800 Working Group,
Below are the results of the Champion's email vote which ended on
June 11, 2011. There were 8 others that were sent back to the technical
committees (not shown in this list). One of those passed with friendly
amendments and two others require some additional clarification.
We would like to get approval for those Mantis items that have been approved
by both the Technical Committees and the Champions. A summary of the Mantis
items is shown below.
All of these resolutions were unanimously approved by both the Champions
and the Technical Committees (except for items 27,28,29).
5 of 7 Champions participated in this email vote.
John is currently on a leave and Dave was at DAC.
Neil
The Resolution of being a duplicate was unanimously approved by the
Champions in the email vote which ended on June 11, 2011.
1. 2985 SV-EC Multi-dimensional queues
2. 3405 SV-EC Virtual interface example typos
The Resolution of "no change required" was unanimously approved by the
Champions in the email vote which ended on June 11, 2011.
3. 2935 SV-EC Correction to example in 9.7. in 1800-2009
4. 1214 SV-BC Why a separate package name space? (19.13)
5. 2540 SV-BC Package and identifier "::" rules
6. 1106 SV-BC procedural assign to nonconstant part select and force of
nonconstant bit-select
The proposal was unanimously approved by the
Champions in the email vote which ended on June 11, 2011.
7. 3254 SV-EC 18.5.6 if-else constraints mistakenly uses the work "block" when
it means "set"
8. 2982 SV-BC Keyword "rand" is used in example as variable ident - this
should not compile
9. 3297 SV-EC 18.6.2 font size issue
10. 3181 SV-EC incorrect syntax in with clause in example in 18.5.7.2
11. 2952 SV-EC Identifier case error in 25.9 virtual interface example
12. 2662 SV-BC misleading pseudo-nonterminal name in escaped identifier
production in Annex A
13. 3216 SV-BC 'simple_type' excerpt error
14. 2901 SV-BC var and type() in for_variable_declarations
15. 2835 SV-BC It should be legal to explicitly specify let arguments as untyped
16. 3151 SV-BC Unnecessary variable declaration in factorial function (13.4.2)
17. 3384 SV-BC on integer data type signing
18. 3026 SV-BC Mess with $rewind and $frewind
19. 3362 SV-BC "literal string" should be "string literal" - two more
20. 3274 SV-BC 'shortreal' should be bold
21. 3062 SV-BC Extra space in %t example
22. 2977 SV-BC [EDITORIAL ISSSUE] Wrong characters used in LRM example for
array literal
23. 2976 SV-BC wrong xref at end of configurations clause
24. 2595 SV-BC protect pragma is also standard
25. 2929 SV-BC ref_declaration should use list_of_variable_port_identifiers
26. 2395 SV-BC Incorrect note attached to net_port_type production
The Resolution of "no change required" was unanimously approved by the
Champions in the email vote which ended on June 11, 2011.
27. 0245 SV-EC Array of queues
Gord Vreugdenhil - abstain (in sv-ec)
The summary says array of queues - not sure that what exists is as general
as what was requested. Persistence of elements is a key point with this.
The proposal was unanimously approved by the
Champions in the email vote which ended on June 11, 2011.
28. 3491 SV-AC Incorrect local variable flow rule in F.5.4
Erik Seligman - abstain (in sv-ac)
I don't understand the formal semantics well enough to figure out if this
is ultimately the desired expression, so I'll have to trust you guys!
The Resolution of being a duplicate was approved by the
Champions in the email vote which ended on June 11, 2011.
29. 2271 SV-AC minor sequence events require a clocked sequence
Shalom: Didn't have time to review it in detail.
Received on Tue Jun 14 17:32:25 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 14 2011 - 17:32:28 PDT