P1800 Working Group,
Below are the results of the Champion's email vote which ended on April 8, 2011.
There were 4 others that were sent back to the technical committees (not
shown in this list). Two of those 4 were actually approved by the Champions
with friendly amendments.
We would like to get approval for those Mantis items that have been approved
by both the Technical Committees and the Champions. A summary of the Mantis
items is shown below.
11 of these resolutions were unanimously approved by both the Champions
and the Technical Committees. There is a set of 4 that Shalom didn't get a
chance to review. Shalom is one of the Champions. That set of 4 is shown
separately from the others.
5 of 6 Champions participated in this email vote.
John is currently on leave.
Neil
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
P1800 Working Group,
Below are the results of the Champion's email vote which ended on April 8, 2011.
There were 4 others that were sent back to the technical committees (not
shown in this list). Two of those 4 were actually approved by the Champions
with friendly amendments.
We would like to get approval for those Mantis items that have been approved
by both the Technical Committees and the Champions. A summary of the Mantis
items is shown below.
11 of these resolutions were unanimously approved by both the Champions
and the Technical Committees. There is a set of 4 that Shalom didn't get a
chance to review. Shalom is one of the Champions. That set of 4 is shown
separately from the others.
5 of 6 Champions participated in this email vote.
John is currently on leave.
Neil
The Resolution of "no change required" was unanimously approved by the
Champions in the email vote which ended on April 8, 2011.
- Unanimously approved by the Technical Committee and the Champions.
- The first 3 were addressed by mantis 2476.
1. 1675 SV-AC Assertion system function syntax is not complete
2. 3037 SV-AC Introduce assertion system functions for 4-valued type support
3. 2387 SV-AC Layout of 16.11 is inconsistent
4. 2209 SV-AC Add optional event control to deferred assertions in 2005
The proposal was unanimously approved by the
Champions in the email vote which ended on April 8, 2011.
- Unanimously approved by the Technical Committee and the Champions.
5. 1933 SV-AC 16.13.6 reference to triggered method can be improved
6. 753 SV-CC No VPI object for an iterative constraint
7. 3376 SV-AC triggered should be typeset as code
8. 3377 SV-AC Fix method names in C.2.3 ended sequence method
Approved by the Champions with friendly amendments
- From the Champions email vote of February 7th.
- The friendly amendments have since been made.
- The updated proposals were unanimously approved by both the TC and the
Champions.
9. 2386 SV-AC Rename 16.9 to "Local variables"?
10. 2839 SV-AC Contradictory statement of increment/decrement operators usage.
11. 2557 SV-AC Rules for passing automatic variables to sequence subroutines
are not clear
The proposal was approved by the Champions in the email vote which ended on
April 8, 2011.
- Shalom didn't get a chance to review this set of 4
- Unanimously approved by the Technical Committee
12. 3355 SV-CC VPI object model for constraints is not consistent with
constraint syntax
A few changes are being made to two diagrams.
13. 2804 SV-AC Need to clarify rule (b) in 16.15.6 to allow inferred clock
when expression appears in procedural assertion
There is a proposal (2 pages - there are several changes).
14. 3191 SV-AC Allow sequence methods with sequence expressions
There is an 8 page proposal (several small changes scattered around).
15. 1477 SV-CC virtual interfaces information model
There is a 22 page proposal.
Received on Wed Apr 13 16:32:43 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 13 2011 - 16:32:45 PDT