Re: [P1800] Procedural suggestion

Hi Shalom,

Thanks for pointing this out.

Ok, it seems to be my problem--I somehow missed this.
I shall pay closer attention in the future.

Thanks,

Nikhil

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Bresticker, Shalom <
shalom.bresticker@intel.com> wrote:

> Nikhil,
>
> For clarification:
>
> The March 25 minutes, published on March 27 by Dennis, included the
> following:
>
>
> *10 P1800 technical committees and Champions operational update *
>
> Discussions on getting the technical committees started again resumed from
> the suspended meeting. The committees should be technical work on errata
> and clarifications. And enhancements motivated by the requirements
> gathering meeting should be taken into account as well. Any work the
> subcommittee do will not be officially approved until after the PAR is
> approved and the Working Group are formed.
>
> A motion (Dennis Brophy, Matt Maidment) was made to authorize the
> subcommittees to develop a list of the top-25 errata, enhancements and
> clarification issues or categories taking in to consideration the feedback
> from the requirements gathering meeting. The creation of this list is to be
> completed by 13 May 2010. The committees are authorized to approve FIX,
> CLOSE and DUPLICATE errata items. The motion passed with one dissent.
> (Cadence is recorded as voting against the motion.)
>
> The subcommittees can now on or after the following times: SV-BC Monday 9
> a.m. – 11 a.m. PDT, SV-EC 11 a.m. – 1 p.m. PDT starting on the 12 April
> 2010 and the SV-CC can start meeting on Wednesday, 14 April 2010.
>
> Regards,
> Shallom
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* owner-ieee1800@eda.org [mailto:owner-ieee1800@eda.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Rishiyur Nikhil
> *Sent:* Friday, May 14, 2010 5:56 PM
>
> *To:* IEEE P1800 Working Group
> *Subject:* [P1800] Procedural suggestion
>
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to make a procedural suggestion that any major action
> items that are of general interest be announcd on the general
> reflector, and not just on the sub-committee lists (sv-bc, sv-ac,
> sv-cc and sv-ec). The membership of those lists reflects active
> participation over the last few years, and does not include people
> like me who are looking at future participation.
>
> In yesterday's meeting, it came as quite a shock to me to hear reports
> on a process that I completely missed, merely because I missed one
> meeting (the last one), and because I'm not on any of the
> sub-committee mailing lists. I would have greatly liked to
> participate in the "Top 25" process (and my interest and intent has
> been clear by my attendance and participation for the last 3 months),
> but yesterday was the first I heard about it (too late).
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Nikhil
>
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Brophy, Dennis <dennisb@model.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>>
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.