[P1800] RE: [sv-champions] Champions spreadsheet posted

Karen,

Here are my "champion" votes.

368 YES
367 YES, but I do not think the second change is necessary.
         In fact, I think the new wording is less clear than the original.
366 YES, with the correction noted by Neil (already in data base, as
"proposal366c.htm"
365 YES
364 YES
363 YES
362 YES
361 YES
360 YES
359 YES
358 YES, with spelling correction: "upto" should be "up to"
357 YES
356 YES
355 YES (Since this is closing a bug as being a duplicate, does it even need
         to be brought up at the P1800 working group?)
350 YES
349 YES
333 YES
313 YES (note that this change is for the P1364 LRM)
254 YES, but the following needs to be brought to the working group's
attention:
         - The proposed changes substantially improve the standard, but...
         - Not fully backward compatible with 3.1a
         - There is a known impact to the VPI that is not covered
         - Might impact other parts of the standard that have not been
studied
         - Some committee members (myself included) feel this is a show
stopper
           that should delay the ballot draft until fully explored and
resolved!
234 YES
196 YES
52 YES
50 NO, this item was already passed by the P1800 working group and is
implemented
        in P1800/D3. It only has minor editing corrections listed in the
bug notes
        (actually, corrections to the original change specification). This
does not
        need to go back to the P1800 working group for re-approval.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Sutherland
stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
+1-503-692-0898
 
Received on Thu Feb 3 22:09:33 2005