RE: [P1800] Champions spreadsheet posted

I recommend approval for all of the items on that list.
Francoise
       '

  _____

From: owner-ieee1800@eda.org [mailto:owner-ieee1800@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Karen Pieper
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 11:33 AM
To: sv-champions@eda.org; srouji@us.ibm.com; Karen.Pieper@synopsys.com;
matthew.r.maidment@intel.com; Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com;
Mehdi.Mohtashemi@synopsys.com; Neil.Korpusik@sun.com; chas;
Ghassan.Khoory@synopsys.com; fhaque@cisco.com; Arif.Samad@synopsys.com;
ieee1800@eda.org; Warmke, Doug
Subject: [P1800] Champions spreadsheet posted

Hi, all,

        I've posted the Champions issue list for tomorrow mornings P1800
meeting at:

http://www.eda-twiki.org/sv/sv-champions/Resolved_Issues_05_02_02.htm

        Note: this is the last meeting where issues can be passed before
the balloting LRM is created.

Chairs, please review the list to make sure that everything your committee
needs to have passed is in the list.

Champions, please cast a vote on each item in the spreadsheet by 8pm Pacific
time tonight. The choices are:

        Recommend approval
        Recommend rejection for this revision of the LRM (please add a
comment that I can read to the P1800)

The list again for voting:

IdCategorySummaryResolutionDup IDSV-* Vote
368SV-BCBNF for bind_target_scopefixed0Unanimous
367SV-BCReconcile conflicts in approved proposalsfixed0Unanimous
366SV-CCPart Select Utility Semantics: Choice and
Clarificationfixed0Unanimous
365SV-ACmisleading use of semicolon in action blocksfixed0Unanimous
364SV-ACIncorrect use of ## for multiple clock concatenationfixed0Unanimous
363SV-ACMisleading labels for the last assume examplefixed0Unanimous
362SV-ACIncorrect description of last example for
multi-clocksfixed0Unanimous
361SV-ACIncorrect multi-clock examplefixed0Unanimous
360SV-ACIncorrect description of a figure/examplefixed0Unanimous
359SV-ACMissing assume statementfixed0Unanimous
358SV-ACIncorrect description of an examplefixed0Unanimous
357SV-BCUnpacked wire assignment requires element equivalencefixed0Unanimous
356SV-BCerror in example section 2.7fixed0Unanimous
355SV-CCvpiMember, not vpiMembersduplicate353Unanimous
350SV-CCSmall change needed in svdpi.h preprocessor codefixed0Unanimous
349SV-CCconst-ness needed for DPI string argumentsfixed0Unanimous
333SV-CCVPI support for types on wiresfixed0Unanimous
313V-PTFPTF 296: Generate stmts will need change made in VPIfixed0Unanimous
254SV-BCAggregate expressions (14, 94, 100, 102, 112, 146, 212)fixed01
opposedConcern for loss of backwards compatibility and divergence from C,
polymorphism
234SV-ECassociative_dimension BNFfixed0Unanimous
196SV-ACHM1: Allow optional argument types in
sequences/propertiesfixed0Unanimous
52SV-CCvpiFuncType return values for systemVerilog datatypesfixed0Unanimous
50SV-CCChange DPI svLogicVec32 representation to match PLI/VPI aval/bval
representationfixed0Unanimous

Thanks,

Karen
Received on Thu Feb 3 16:07:38 2005