[P1800] RE: 11 October 2004 Unapproved Meeting Minutes

From: Brophy, Dennis <dennisb@model.com>
Date: Sun Nov 21 2004 - 12:54:28 PST

> -----Original Message-----
> From: shalom@eagle.msil.sps.mot.com
> [mailto:shalom@eagle.msil.sps.mot.com] On Behalf Of
> Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 12:08 AM
> To: Brophy, Dennis
> Cc: ieee1800@eda.org
> Subject: Re: 11 October 2004 Unapproved Meeting Minutes
>
> Thanks, Dennis.
>
> I have some corrections and comments.
>
> On p. 4, in Item 10 (P1364), it says,
>
> "The question was raised as to when the cutoff for work would
> need to be. Would it need to be December 2004 or could it be
> March 2005? After discussion, it was noted that a March 2005
> cutoff would permit us to meet the DAC completion timeline."
>
> Was a decision made?

Johny's note to you on this added to the minutes.

>
>
> Regarding my "affiliations" on the Champions list, it omitted
> my participation in BTF and email participation in PTF.
> Also I was/am document editor for 1364-2001 Version C and
> Errata and 1364-2005 drafts.

I've asked Karen to modify her presentation.

>
>
> On p. 5, it says,
> "There was no descent that the revision after next is to be
> one document and that for now they remain separate."
> I think "descent" should be "dissent"?
>
>

Changed.

> On p. 5, it says,
> "Depreciate PLI 1.0" and
> "A motion (Victor Berman, Cliff Cummings) was made to let the
> PTF determine a path to depreciation of PLI 1.0..."
>
> I think "deprecate" is more appropriate.
>

Those were the words of the proposer, but written, the verb/sentence
construction can be improved. Your change was made.

>
> On p. 5, it says,
> "In P1364 there are 90+ enhancements that are features
> covered by SystemVerilog."
>
> It sounds like this number came from the list at
> http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/enhance.html.
>
> That list contains the BTF issues in the open state (94).
>
> There are 7 more in the proposal state at
> http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/btf_proposal.html.
>
> Of those 101, while many are certainly covered by SV, I
> believe it is far less than 90+ out of 101.
>

This information was supplied by the team. I suggest that corrected
information be shared with the group for offical recording at the next
meeting.

>
> On p. 6, it says,
> "The work in the BTF to date is to prioritize these. This
> work is being don by Alec Stanculescu, Stu Sutherland and
> Steve Sharp."
> ("don" should be "done".)
> Is this a new group or the old prioritization group?
> That group was Alec, Steve, and I, not Stu Sutherland.
>
>

Correction to done made, and I would assume this is the "old"
prioritization group.

> I hope to attend the November meeting in Israel in person.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Shalom
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Brophy, Dennis wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > You will find two versions of the meeting minutes, one with the
> > reference content embedded if that content is a PDF file
> and one where
> > you will need to be connected to the internet to resolve the links
> > yourself. The one without resolution is small, the one
> with resolved
> > links is large.
> >
> > Small version:
> >
> <http://www.eda-twiki.org/sv-ieee1800/Meetings/2004/October/10-11-04
MeetingMin
> > utesUnapproved.pdf> (51K)
> > Full version:
> >
> <http://www.eda-twiki.org/sv-ieee1800/Meetings/2004/October/10-11-04
MeetingMin
> > utesUnapproved.pdf> (1.3M)
> >
> > Please let me know of any errors or omissions to the minutes and I
> > will correct them.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dennis
>
> --
> Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker
> @freescale.com
> Design & Verification Methodology Tel:
> +972 9 9522268
> Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax:
> +972 9 9522890
> POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell:
> +972 50 5441478
>
> [ ]Freescale Internal Use Only [ ]Freescale Confidential
> Proprietary
>
>
Received on Sun Nov 21 12:54:59 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 21 2004 - 12:55:02 PST