Summary of inputs from the Technical committees on the schedule svac End of February svbc December 15 svcc January 15? (or is it Feb 15?) svec December 15 svac The following is the list of the key outstanding SV-AC Mantis items along with their effort estimations according to the responses of the committee members. * Mapping assertion system tasks to callbacks(1898): 3 weeks * LTL operators (1932): 1 month * Checkers (1900): 2 months * Solution for glitch problem (2005): 2.5 months * Allow concurrent assertions in for loops (1995): 2 weeks * Local variable arguments (1667): 2 weeks The following is considered an important goal, but there is currently no Mantis item for it: * Define formal semantics for cover statement: 2 months This list above does not include items that were considered to be close to resolution: * Adding missing argument types (1549) * Local variable initializers (1668) * Future value functions (1682) * Let construct in assertions (1728) * Boolean implication and equivalence (1758) SV-AC will hold a face-to-face meeting in Austin on 2-3 OCT 2007 to work intensively on the key items and any of the items considered close to resolution that have not been resolved by that time. Regardless, it seems very likely that a number of key items will not be resolved by the 15 NOV 2007 feature freeze. The sum of the effort estimates is roughly 9.25 months. Assuming that the committee can work in parallel on two key items, we think that we have a good chance of completing all these items by the end of FEB 2008. Any extension that P1800 can give on the 15 NOV 2007 date will increase the chance of resolving more key items for the 2008 standard. svbc This is a note to bring to your attention a matter that was voted on in today's SV-BC meeting. Specifically, the committee unanimously voted to request a 1 month extension of the feature freeze to have time to address name resolution issues as well as other issues identified by Neil (JEITA and 1800-2005) and a limited set of issues to be determined by October 15. Please note that if the issues, especially those with name resolution, are not addressed, the results will most likely be divergent implementations. svcc I think we are probably going to need another 3 months to clean up all these issues. Also, we will need one month after the SV-BC has finished the parameterized types enhancement to add the VPI that goes with it. So, our end date may be dependent on theirs. svec In today's SV-EC meeting a motion was approved to request a one month delay for the p1800 'Feature Freeze' deadline date (originally set for November 15th 2007). This extension will be required to address the most important outstanding issues that can be resolved for this draft of p1800 LRM, for example the queue issues. Champions Needs to extend at least 2 weeks beyond svac, svbc, svcc, svec