[sv-dc] RE: Draft of slides for P1800 WG meeting on Friday

Good point again Shekar.  How about this?

Thanks,
Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Shekar Chetput [mailto:shekar@cadence.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 2:02 PM
To: Little, Scott; sv-dc@eda.org
Subject: RE: Draft of slides for P1800 WG meeting on Friday

Got it, Thanks Scott. In the rough plan slides, you might also want to add an interim goal or expectation for R07, now that it is a MUST - as it depends on SV-CC. (similar to a projection on R05 which has a dependency on SV-VAMS). Thanks again!
Cheers,
Shekar.

-----Original Message-----
From: Little, Scott [mailto:scott.little@intel.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 1:32 PM
To: Shekar Chetput; sv-dc@eda.org
Subject: RE: Draft of slides for P1800 WG meeting on Friday

Good catch Shekar.  No, that was a bad mistake on my part.

I have attached an updated version that incorporates the feedback I have received.

Thanks,
Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Shekar Chetput [mailto:shekar@cadence.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 1:28 PM
To: Little, Scott; sv-dc@eda.org
Subject: RE: Draft of slides for P1800 WG meeting on Friday

Scott,
Thanks much for that draft, looks good to me. I have a question:

"R07: Access to the name of drivers" is listed in "SHOULD items" slide. The same item is listed as a MUST in the latest roadmap doc. 

Did it become a should in the slide because of the projected dependency with SV-CC (i.e to add a data model for nettypes in VPI)?
Cheers,
Shekar.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-dc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-dc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Little, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 2:43 PM
To: sv-dc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-dc] Draft of slides for P1800 WG meeting on Friday

Hi all,

I have attached my first draft of the slides for the P1800 WG meeting on Friday.  I have a 20 minute slot.  Please send any feedback you may have before EOD/COB on Thursday.

Thanks,
Scott

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.