I assumed that "Global variable access" was intended to mean access to anything but local variables of the function, which I believe is the current restriction. These might not actually be global variables. From: owner-sv-dc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-dc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Gordon Vreugdenhil Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 7:12 PM To: O'Leary, Martin; Little, Scott; sv-dc@eda.org Subject: Re: [sv-dc] RE: SV-DC agenda for 2015.02.27 On 2/26/15 3:07 PM, O'Leary, Martin wrote: Hi, I have some questions on some of the items in the roadmap as it wasn't exactly clear what was meant from the minutes. Thanks, --Martin R08. [] Allow sensitivity to aggregates in event controls R10. [] Event sensitivity to UDNs What is the precise difference between the above two items? - they seem pretty similar They are. R08 is probably a bit more general in that it would impact variable or other aggregate expressions as well, not just UDNs. R11. [] Global variable access in resolution functions What is a global variable is SV - does this instead mean hierarchical references? "Global" is a bit imprecise -- "compilation unit" (or package) is better. Ex: int some_thing; module top; child c1(); child c2(); endmodule module child; initial some_thing++ endmodule In this case, some_thing is a "compilation unit" variable that is directly visible within the modules (etc) compiled "at the same time". The LRM talks about a couple of models for what "at the same time" means and vendors have various behaviors that more or less align with the models. If you have a compilation unit that spans the entire design, then some_thing would in fact be a "global" variable. Gord From: owner-sv-dc@eda.org<mailto:owner-sv-dc@eda.org> [mailto:owner-sv-dc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Little, Scott Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 3:48 PM To: sv-dc@eda.org<mailto:sv-dc@eda.org> Subject: [sv-dc] SV-DC agenda for 2015.02.27 Please note that the conference ID is different from previous meetings. I have added a few potential work items to discuss. One is a follow-up from last meeting. The others are new items that were discussed in the last round and have been requested internally at Intel recently. Hopefully those discussions will be quick. Please let me know if there are other items. As Gord mentioned in the last meeting please take a bit of time to think about your bandwidth to do proposal work in the upcoming PAR. Meeting attendance is great but to move forward folks will have to commit time outside of the meetings. I think it would be useful in the time estimates to assign 1-2 owners for each proposal we consider a must do. These owners can then look at what they are expected to do during the PAR and wager a guess at the amount of time it may take to complete them. Thanks, Scott Agenda: 1. IEEE patent policy (http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt) Please read the above content if you aren't familiar with it already. 2. Minutes Approval 3. Discuss potential work items a. Strings in UDNs [MartinO] b. Late binding of resolution functions [ScottL] c. State in resolution functions [ScottL] 4. Roadmap document [http://goo.gl/OOI0gN] a. Prioritize work items b. Discuss bandwidth of participants c. Estimate time required for work items Upcoming dates to note: 2015-02-27 - SV-DC meeting 2015-03-06 - P1800 Working Group Meeting Dial-in Information: US: 1 888 875 9370 India: 1 800 425 2663 (or) 080 2520-8990 Israel: 08-666-2663 Eindhoven: +31 4080 02004 Bridge: 5 Conference ID: 293521529 ......................................................................................................................................... --> Join Lync Meeting<https://meet.intel.com/scott.little/7PYH2JNJ> Join by phone +1(916)356-2663 (or your local bridge access #) Choose bridge 5.<tel:+1%28916%29356-2663%20%28or%20your%20local%20bridge%20access%20#%29%20Choose%20bridge%205.> (Global) English (United States) Find a local number<https://dial.intel.com> Conference ID: 293521529 Forgot your dial-in PIN?<https://dial.intel.com> |Help<http://o15.officeredir.microsoft.com/r/rlidLync15?clid=1033&p1=5&p2=2009> [!OC([1033])!] ......................................................................................................................................... -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be clean. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Verification Technologies, Mentor Graphics gordonv@model.com<mailto:gordonv@model.com> -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Feb 26 16:16:03 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 26 2015 - 16:16:03 PST