[sv-dc] RE: Minutes from SV-DC meeting on 2015.01.23

Yep, my understanding of that standardization thought was for UDNs (i.e UDTs +/- UDRs).
Cheers,
Shekar.

From: owner-sv-dc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-dc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 11:31 AM
To: sv-dc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-dc] RE: Minutes from SV-DC meeting on 2015.01.23

Please add a definition of  'UDT' in 4(e). Is this a net declared with a UDN?

But, if so, then what does it mean in 4(f) that "it would be good to standardize on some UDTs."? Should that be "standardize on some UDNs"?

-- Brad

In reply to http://www.eda-twiki.org/sv-dc/hm/0535.html .



--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.