[sv-dc] RE: E-mail vote: Due Sept. 30

Seeing no objections I have uploaded a new version that includes Steven's suggested change. It is version9.

Thanks,
Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-dc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-dc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Little Scott-B11206
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 3:40 PM
> To: Steven Sharp
> Cc: sv-dc@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-dc] RE: E-mail vote: Due Sept. 30
>
> Hi Steven:
>
> I agree. Are there any objections to removing the grammar changes to
> 23.2.2.1 as Steven suggests?
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-dc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-dc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> > Steven Sharp
> > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 2:17 PM
> > To: Little Scott-B11206; sv-dc@eda.org
> > Subject: [sv-dc] RE: E-mail vote: Due Sept. 30
> >
> > Mantis 3724 __X_ Yes ____ No
> > http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3724
> > http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/file_download.php?file_id=5470&type=bug
> >
> > I did notice that the added productions for Non-ANSI style port
> > declarations appear to be redundant, as the same syntax can be
> obtained
> > from the net_port_type production that has been extended to include
> > interconnect. If I am correct, these productions should be removed.
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.