[sv-dc] RE: new version 19 for 3398 proposal.

I removed the duplication.
At the end of the paragraph describing initialization of nets, I added the following note:
Note that the default value for a logic net of a user-defined nettype is x.

Is that sufficient?
Francoise
        '
________________________________
From: Little Scott-B11206 [mailto:B11206@freescale.com]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 9:08 AM
To: Francoise Martinolle; Bresticker, Shalom; sv-dc@eda.org
Subject: RE: new version 19 for 3398 proposal.

Hi Francoise:

v20 still has two change sets for 7.2.2 (bottom of pg. 5 and top of pg. 6) where the first one is correct and the second is old and incorrect.

Was anything added to clarify the differences in initial values between a net and a net of a user-define nettype whose type is a single logic bit?

Thanks,
Scott

From: owner-sv-dc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-dc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Francoise Martinolle
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 3:11 PM
To: Bresticker, Shalom; sv-dc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-dc] RE: new version 19 for 3398 proposal.

Thanks Shalom,
I uploaded version 20 which corrects these.

Francoise
       '

________________________________
From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 5:57 AM
To: Francoise Martinolle; sv-dc@eda.org
Subject: RE: new version 19 for 3398 proposal.
Minor editorial comments:

1. 6.6: "There are different kinds of net types: built-in or user-defined."
Add "two" before "different". I don't usually like adding numbers, but here I think it is better.

2. In net_declaration syntax, "delay_control" should be blue, not bolded.

3. In 28.12, delete "(Resolution of nets with user-defined nettypes)." That is not the name of subclause 6.6.7.

4. In the change to net_port_type syntax at the end of the document, the FROM part should be black, not blue. In both FROM and TO, there should be a blank, not an underscore, before "data_type_or_implicit".

Regards,
Shalom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.