[sv-dc] RE: new version 19 for 3398 proposal.

looks ok

From: Francoise Martinolle [mailto:fm@cadence.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 11:11 PM
To: Bresticker, Shalom; sv-dc@eda.org
Subject: RE: new version 19 for 3398 proposal.

Thanks Shalom,
I uploaded version 20 which corrects these.

Francoise
       '

________________________________
From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 5:57 AM
To: Francoise Martinolle; sv-dc@eda.org
Subject: RE: new version 19 for 3398 proposal.
Minor editorial comments:

1. 6.6: "There are different kinds of net types: built-in or user-defined."
Add "two" before "different". I don't usually like adding numbers, but here I think it is better.

2. In net_declaration syntax, "delay_control" should be blue, not bolded.

3. In 28.12, delete "(Resolution of nets with user-defined nettypes)." That is not the name of subclause 6.6.7.

4. In the change to net_port_type syntax at the end of the document, the FROM part should be black, not blue. In both FROM and TO, there should be a blank, not an underscore, before "data_type_or_implicit".

Regards,
Shalom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.