RE: [sv-dc] RE: Revised proposal for 3398 and response to Shalom's comments

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker@intel.com>
Date: Wed Aug 24 2011 - 04:16:09 PDT

I think that the definition of 'matching nettypes' should be placed as an additional 2 items at the end of the list of 6.22.1 ("Matching types"), instead of as a completely new subclause.

Shalom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Aug 24 04:16:56 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 24 2011 - 04:16:56 PDT