[sv-dc] RE: mantis 3398 updated

Hi Scott,

yes you are correct. I am going to reverse that change and also update the source code so
that something is done with other_data (nobody was either writing or reading other_data which is why
I deleted it).

________________________________
From: Little Scott-B11206 [mailto:B11206@freescale.com]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 11:32 AM
To: Francoise Martinolle; sv-dc@eda.org
Subject: RE: mantis 3398 updated

Hi Francoise:

Thanks for the update. Can you explain the removal of the other_data field in the example on page 3 (the end of the changes to 6.6.7)? I believe that line should stay or the rest of the example needs to be updated to adjust for that change.

Thanks,
Scott

From: owner-sv-dc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-dc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Francoise Martinolle
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 8:54 AM
To: sv-dc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-dc] mantis 3398 updated

I made a new version 12 for 3398. This version has only editorial changes found
by Steven Sharp.

Francoise
       '

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.