Re: [sv-dc] 3398 proposal

I have a few minor comments; if those could be updated prior
to the meeting, I'd be fine with voting on the proposal today.

1) Shade of blue needs to be made consistent

2) In 6.6.7, just after the grammar:
        "A net declared with that nettype therefore uses ..."
      should say:
        "A net declared with a nettype therefore uses

       Similarly, in 6.7.1, second sentence:
         "A net declared with that nettype uses the ..."
       should say
         "A net declared with a nettype uses the ..."

3) In the 6.6.7 and 6.22.6 examples, there is the following:
         // if nettypeid1 is a nettype, create another nettype name
nettypeid2
      Why is this a conditional statement? It should be
      something like:
         // declare another name nettypeid2 for nettype nettypeid1

4) In 28.12, there is a missing period at the end of the blue text.

5) The "open items" must be removed from the proposal.

Gord.

On 5/13/2011 2:08 PM, Francoise Martinolle wrote:
> Hi Scott,
> I forgot to mention that this proposal version 7 can serve as the
> basis of the vote for Wednesday.
> Francoise
> '
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Vreugdenhil                                503-685-0808
Model Technology (Mentor Graphics)                gordonv@model.com
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.