Re: [sv-dc] nettype 3-D and logic

typo: didn't mean to use "logic" as the second/third nettype names,
assume "slogic" and "wreal" instead.

Kev.

On 03/09/2011 10:22 AM, Kevin Cameron wrote:
> If you look back to 3-D discussions, my take on where we should go is
> that the following kind of declaration would work -
>
> nettype (bool value,bool strength,bool driven) logic;
> <various methods>
> endnettype
>
> The various methods are the things that are currently implicit, e.g. the
> default resolution function, posedge, negedge etc. You can view at as a
> special template class, strength and driven being optional.
>
> The strength type would be -
>
> nettype (bool value,enum strength,bool driven) logic;
> <various methods>
> endnettype
>
> wreal -
>
> nettype (real val,,bool driven) logic; // no strength
> <various methods>
> endnettype
>
>
> Any problems with that approach?
>
> Kev.
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.