Date: Fri Jul 17 2015 - 08:45:06 PDT
Not sure if this went through. Sorry if it is a duplicate. From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Jim Vellenga Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 11:41 AM To: SV-CC eda.org Subject: {Spam?} [sv-cc] New Mantis item: Interpretation of vpiVirtual for class methods I have filed a new Mantis item: http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=5364 (0005364: Interpretation of vpiVirtual for class methods), in which I raise the question as to whether vpiVirtual should denote the presence of the "virtual" keyword in the method declaration or if it should also be true if the method has inherited from a method that has explicitly been declared as "virtual". I welcome feedback, preferably attached to the Mantis item. Regards, Jim V. [http://www.cadence.com/mail/footer_logocdns2.jpg] [Fortune 100 Best Companies to Work For]<http://fortune.com/best-companies/cadence-71/> Jim Vellenga | Senior Principal Software Engineer P: 978.262.6015 www.cadence.com<http://www.cadence.com/> -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
