Minutes of IEEE P1800 SV-AC meeting #2006-11: 07/11/2006 Written by: Ed Cerny Code for the conference call: Domestic: 888-635-9997 International: 763-315-6815 Participant code: 2638198 Attendance Record Legend: x = attended - = missed r = represented . = not yet a member v = valid voter (3 out of last 4 or 75% overall) n = not valid voter n[xxx-x-x-xx-] Faisal Haque (Cisco, Chairman) v[xxx-xxxxxxx] Eduard Cerny (Synopsys - Co-chair) v[xxxxxxx--xx] John Havlicek (Freescale) v[xxxxxxxxxxx] Doron Bustan (Freescale) v[xxxxxxxx-xx] Manisha Kulshrestha (Mentor Graphics) v[xxx---x-xx-] Volkan Esen (Infineon) v[-xxx-xxxxxx] Bassam Tabbara (Synopsys) v[-xxxx-xx-xx] Hillel Miller (Freescale) v[-x--xxxxxx-] Surrendra Dudani (Synopsys) v[-xxxx-xx---] Joseph Lu (Altera) [.x-x------x] Yaniv Fais (Freescale) v[..xxxxxxxxx] Dmitry Korchemny (Intel) [....xxxxxxx] Lisa Piper (Cadence) ============|--------------------------07/11/2006 Agenda: ------- - Review IEEE working group rules - Review errata reported in Mantis Minutes: -------- 1) Karen provided information about what can / should not be considered as changes to the LRM under the current PAR and when the next PAR is likely to be approved. 2) Dmitry introduced Intel's proposal for enhancing SystemVerilog to support checker development and more expressive assertions. All to read and comment - the proposal is on Mantis under erratum #1530. We should schedule one or more sessions for Dmitry to present the proposal. 3) 1326 - proposal unanimously accepted. Resolved. 4) 928 - proposal unanimously accepted. Resolved. 5) 1392 - minor typo corrections required in the proposal. Once done, the erratum will be resolved. 6) 1381 - proposal unanimously accepted. Resolved. 7) 966 - last statement in the proposal should be changed to "cannot be used as an operand in an expression". Need to resolve the issue of a parameter type in Section 6.3.2.1. Should it be - any integer type and $ is preserved in type conversions? - an untyped parameter only? - a paremeter of type int? - other? The exmaple should break the if statement into two: first to check for $ using $isunbounded, and if this is not the case check for other values in nested if statements. Action items: All to discuss item 966 by email to come to a conclusion by the next meeting. Next meeting: 07/25/2006 at 9 am PT (12 pm ET, 5 pm GMT). ====