[sv-ac] RE: Call to vote: Due February 14

I vote YES for 2412, 3113, and 3135.

For 3135, a friendly amendment: in the three instances of this long sentence, I think we should replace the work "then" with a comma:

When the nexttime property is evaluated in a time step that is not a tick of the clock of the nexttime property then an alignment to the tick of the clock of the nexttime property should be applied before the above description.

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Korchemny, Dmitry
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 11:12 AM
To: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] Call to vote: Due February 14

-You have until 11.59 pm PDT, Monday, February 14, 2011 to respond

-An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible

  voters respond with a YES vote.

-If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a reason.

  The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference

call.

As of the February 8, 2011 meeting, the eligible voters are:

Ashok Bhatt

Laurence Bisht

Eduard Cerny

Ben Cohen

Tapan Kapoor

Scott Little

Manisha Kulshrestha

Anupam Prabhakar

Erik Seligman

Samik Sengupta

Tom Thatcher

Mantis 2412 ____ Yes ____ No

http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=2412
http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=4748&type=bug

Mantis 3113 ____ Yes ____ No

http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=3113
http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=4758&type=bug

Mantis 3135 ____ Yes ____ No

http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=3135
http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=4764&type=bug

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.