[sv-ac] RE: Updated version of 2328

Hi Ed:

Good catch. That missing text is unchanged. I have added it to my current working version.

I don't have a problem allowing string formal arguments for sequences and properties. I presume you don't want to allow strings in expressions though. What do others think? Can I handle that change in this mantis or does it need a new one?

Thanks,
Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eduard Cerny [mailto:Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 2:09 PM
> To: Little Scott-B11206; sv-ac@eda.org
> Subject: RE: Updated version of 2328
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> - It seems that there is a problem with the replacement within 16.6,
> the text that you have before 16.6.1 is much less than what is in the
> LRM.
> - Why for checkers is it specifically stated that string can be a
> formal argument, I think that it should be allowed for property and
> sequence formal argument, usable only in match item task calls as
> actual arguments.
>
> best...
> ed
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> > Little Scott-B11206
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 4:24 PM
> > To: sv-ac@eda.org
> > Subject: [sv-ac] Updated version of 2328
> >
> > Hi all:
> >
> > I have uploaded a new version of 2328 that addresses feedback given
> by
> > Shalom and Ed.
> >
> > http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2328
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Scott
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.