[sv-ac] RE: Added new proposal for Mantis #2271

From: Seligman, Erik <erik.seligman@intel.com>
Date: Mon Jan 24 2011 - 08:30:52 PST

Tapan- some quick comments:

- I notice the word "should". I believe our standard is that if it's a firm requirement, which I think it is in this case, the word needs to be "shall".

- Also, I think the commas don't sound quite right.

So I would rephrase as "Any sequence instantiated in an event expression shall be explicitly clocked."

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Tapan Kapoor
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 5:45 PM
To: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] Added new proposal for Mantis #2271

Warm regards,
Tapan
"You must be the change you want to see in the world" : Mahatma Gandhi

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Jan 24 08:31:27 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 24 2011 - 08:31:31 PST