RE: [sv-ac] RE: assertion control system tasks

Personally, I think it is better to have a small number of configurable tasks than to add a new task for every different possibility.

Regards,
Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Srinivasan Venkataramanan [mailto:svenka3@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 2:34 PM
> To: Kulshrestha, Manisha
> Cc: Bresticker, Shalom; sv-ac@eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-ac] RE: assertion control system tasks
>
> We have heard similar requests in the past from more than 1 user to
> have $coveroff likes. I would personally opt for $coveroff than adding
> an arg to the $assertoff for ease of use & self documenting code.
>
> Srini
> www.cvcblr.com
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Kulshrestha, Manisha
> <Manisha_Kulshrestha@mentor.com> wrote:
> > Hi Dimitry,
> >
> > I have filed a new mantis 3295. Please find out from the WG if we can
> > work on it.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Manisha
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 4:52 PM
> > To: Kulshrestha, Manisha; sv-ac@eda.org
> > Subject: RE: assertion control system tasks
> >
> > I agree this would be very useful.
> > I recently had such a need.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Shalom
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> >> Kulshrestha, Manisha
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 1:01 PM
> >> To: sv-ac@eda.org
> >> Subject: [sv-ac] assertion control system tasks
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Currently assertion control system tasks control all kinds of
> >> assertions (assert, cover and assume) and there is no way to choose
> > any
> >> specific type. Sometimes it is useful to be able to control only
> >> certain types e.g. sometimes user want to only run asserts and no
> >> covers as they are not interested in coverage. It is not possible to
> >> achieve this with current set of functions. Proabably by adding a
> new
> >> argument to existing functions, we can achieve this enhanced
> >> functionality.
> >>
> >> Dimitry, I am just wondering if it is possible to include this
> >> enhancement in the current PAR ? I'll file a mantis but it would be
> >> good to consider it in this PAR.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >> Manisha

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.