[sv-ac] RE: Mantis 2491

As far as I can see, this text has not changed since 1800-2005 17.14 except for changing "must" to "shall".

Shalom

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Seligman, Erik
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 8:45 PM
To: sv-ac@server.eda.org
Cc: Bustan, Doron
Subject: [sv-ac] Mantis 2491

Hi guys-I took a look at this one that was assigned to me, and am not convinced there is an issue here. See the comment I added at http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=2491:

Erik_Seligman (developer)
2010-07-09 10:42
Top of Form

Bottom of Form
Top of Form

Bottom of Form
Top of Form

Bottom of Form

I looked at the rules in the text, and don't think I understand the conflict. (e) refers to inheriting the default clocking event, and (f) talks about cases where there is no default clocking event.

Does someone have a concrete example of a SVA fragment for which these two rules conflict?

Does someone have a better understanding of this issue? Or could this be another case where edits already fixed it & we just didn't note this in the ticket?

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.