Re: [sv-ac] Draft P1800/D9-preliminary review

From: John Havlicek <john.havlicek_at_.....>
Date: Sat Jul 11 2009 - 10:53:02 PDT
Hi Dmitry:

I checked the implementation of 2486 carefully, and it is fine.

I look very quickly over Annex F and noticed only the following:

p. 1107: in flatten_property(p), item 6), next to last sentence.  The font of "t" in
   "t f = a_f" should be italic.


J.H.

> Hi all,
> 
> It is time to review Draft P1800/D9.
> 
> Each SV-AC member is requested to review the implementation of Mantis items=
>  assigned to him/her, and in addition the assigned fragment of the LRM. The=
>  review is due by 07/10/2009. Please, send a notification when you are done=
> , with the list of issues found or with the indication that the implementat=
> ion is correct. If you find an issue with Mantis implementation, please, ad=
> d a corresponding note to the Mantis with the indication of the actions req=
> uired from the editor, and move the Mantis to the Editor status. If no issu=
> es have been found, keep the Mantis unchanged.
> 
> Mantis list:
> 2661 "Syntax 16-19" is in blue                                             =
>                                                                         Dmi=
> try Korchemny
> 2660 Add indices to expressions                                            =
>                                                    Doron Bustan
> 2659 Backward compatibility issue with sequence property                   =
>                                        Doron Bustan
> 2658       Default values for untyped formals                              =
>                                                            Dmitry Korchemny
> 2656 Clarify difference of $global_clock handling in simulation and formal =
> verification Tom Thatcher
> 2652 Future value functions need clarification                             =
>                                        Erik_Seligman
> 2650 Ambiguity in a sequence repetition [*0] definition                    =
>                              Erik_Seligman
> 2612       `true should have a backtick in a sequence example              =
>                                           Dmitry Korchemny
> 2541 syntax errors - missing parenthesis                                   =
>                                                             Lisa Piper
> 2516 Another contradiction of existing text with 2398 needs to be fixed    =
>                              Erik_Seligman
> 2486 Scope of Annex F definition of "specify" is not clear.                =
>                                              john_havlicek
> 2478       Clock flow subclause is not consistent with multiclocked propert=
> y definition      Dmitry Korchemny
> 
> Fragments:
> Clause 3 (relevant parts) - Tapan
> Clause 15 (relevant parts) - Manisha
> Clause 16
> Beginning - 16.8 (including) Ed
>                 16.9 Ben
>                 16.10 - 16.12 (including), 16.17 - Manisha
>                 16.13 - Doron
>                 16.14 - Lisa
>                 16.15 - Tom
>                 16.16 - 16.18 (including)  Dmitry
> Clause 17 - Erik
> Clause 20 (relevant parts) - Manisha
> Clause 37 (relevant parts) - Bassam
> Clause 39 - Bassam
> Annex A - Tapan
> Annex B - Tapan
> Annex C - Tapan
> Annex F - John
> Annex N - Lisa
> 
> Please, notify me if you are unable to review the assigned fragments/Mantis=
>  items.
> 
> Thanks,
> Dmitry

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sat Jul 11 10:54:02 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jul 11 2009 - 10:55:18 PDT