RE: [sv-ac] Draft P1800/D9-preliminary review

From: Kulshrestha, Manisha <Manisha_Kulshrestha_at_.....>
Date: Thu Jul 09 2009 - 03:23:06 PDT
Hello,
 
I have reviewed the parts assigned to me. I did not find any problems.
 
Manisha

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Korchemny, Dmitry
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 6:28 PM
To: sv-ac@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] Draft P1800/D9-preliminary review



Hi all,

 

It is time to review Draft P1800/D9.

 

Each SV-AC member is requested to review the implementation of Mantis
items assigned to him/her, and in addition the assigned fragment of the
LRM. The review is due by 07/10/2009. Please, send a notification when
you are done, with the list of issues found or with the indication that
the implementation is correct. If you find an issue with Mantis
implementation, please, add a corresponding note to the Mantis with the
indication of the actions required from the editor, and move the Mantis
to the Editor status. If no issues have been found, keep the Mantis
unchanged.

 

Mantis list:

2661 "Syntax 16-19" is in blue
Dmitry Korchemny  

2660 Add indices to expressions
Doron Bustan                                    

2659 Backward compatibility issue with sequence property
Doron Bustan                                    

2658       Default values for untyped formals
Dmitry Korchemny  

2656 Clarify difference of $global_clock handling in simulation and
formal verification Tom Thatcher


2652 Future value functions need clarification
Erik_Seligman                      

2650 Ambiguity in a sequence repetition [*0] definition
Erik_Seligman                      

2612       `true should have a backtick in a sequence example
Dmitry Korchemny  

2541 syntax errors - missing parenthesis
Lisa Piper             

2516 Another contradiction of existing text with 2398 needs to be fixed
Erik_Seligman                      

2486 Scope of Annex F definition of "specify" is not clear.
john_havlicek                      

2478       Clock flow subclause is not consistent with multiclocked
property definition      Dmitry Korchemny 

 

Fragments:

Clause 3 (relevant parts) - Tapan

Clause 15 (relevant parts) - Manisha

Clause 16

Beginning - 16.8 (including) Ed

                16.9 Ben

                16.10 - 16.12 (including), 16.17 - Manisha

                16.13 - Doron

                16.14 - Lisa

                16.15 - Tom

                16.16 - 16.18 (including)  Dmitry

Clause 17 - Erik 

Clause 20 (relevant parts) - Manisha

Clause 37 (relevant parts) - Bassam

Clause 39 - Bassam

Annex A - Tapan

Annex B - Tapan

Annex C - Tapan 

Annex F - John 

Annex N - Lisa

 

Please, notify me if you are unable to review the assigned
fragments/Mantis items.

 

Thanks,

Dmitry

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Jul 9 03:25:36 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 09 2009 - 03:27:39 PDT