[sv-ac] RE: Draft P1800/D9-preliminary review

You have quoted the ballot comment, but the approved change to the standard addresses the comment by adding a note in the LRM that explicitly calls attention to the change, but not as a dperecation. The dictionary definition of deprecate is "to express disapproval of", etc. That is a relevant term when the previous practice is still possible, but disapproved of.

Regards,
Shalom

________________________________
From: Tapan Kapoor [mailto:tkapoor@cadence.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 12:54 PM
To: Bresticker, Shalom; Korchemny, Dmitry
Cc: sv-ac@server.eda.org
Subject: RE: Draft P1800/D9-preliminary review

Hi Shalom,

Thanks for the correction (It's indeed 2562).
Regarding 2659, the proposed solution for this mantis says: " The backwards compatibility issues should be fixed, or it should be explicitly deprecated", although, I do not know the exact difference between the terms "change" and "deprecation" (are these terms defined somewhere?).


Warm regards,

Tapan

"You must be the change you want to see in the world" : Mahatma Gandhi



________________________________
From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 2:24 PM
To: Tapan Kapoor; Korchemny, Dmitry
Cc: sv-ac@server.eda.org
Subject: RE: Draft P1800/D9-preliminary review

Hi,

1.   Mantis 2652, which suggests to update the BNF for checker_or_generate_item_declaration. However, the BNF in A.1.8 Checker items is not updated. (The resolution suggests changes in BNF at two places: section 17-1 and A.1.8. None of them is done.)
[SB] This is Mantis 2562, not 2652. I agree that these BNF updates were not done.

2.   Mantis 2659, which talks about deprecated semantics (of sequence_expr). This deprecation is not listed in Section C. Although, it seems to be alright as per the resolution of this mantis.

[SB] I think this is a change, not deprecation. Also, I noticed that the red box in the margin says that this is ballot comment 91. It should say 95.

Shalom

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.