I vote no. I feel the addition of new statement about 'matches over zero clock ticks' makes it more confusing as the rules below do not support this statement. If it mathes over zero clock ticks then (seq ##0 empty) should be same as (seq). Manisha From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Korchemny, Dmitry Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 3:48 PM To: sv-ac@eda.org Subject: [sv-ac] Call to vote on 2650 Hi all, This is a call to vote on 22650 "Ambiguity in a sequence repetition [*0] definition". Please, vote if you are eligible. - Called on 2009-04-29, final ballots due by 2009-05-03 T 23:59-08:00 PDT. v[-xxx] Doron Bustan (Intel) v[xxxx] Eduard Cerny (Synopsys) v[xx-x] Ben Cohen n[x--x] John Havlicek (Freescale) v[x-xx] Tapan Kapoor (Cadence) t[xxxx] Dmitry Korchemny (Intel - Chair) v[x-xx] Manisha Kulshrestha (Mentor Graphics) n[x-x.] Lisa Piper v[xxxx] Erik Seligman (Intel) v[xxxx] Bassam Tabbara (Synopsys) v[xx-x] Tom Thatcher (Sun Microsystems - Co-Chair) |-------------- attendance on 2009-04-27 |---------------- voting eligibility on 2009-04-27 Legend: x = attended - = missed r = represented . = not yet a member v = valid voter (2 out of last 3 or 2/3 overall) n = not a valid voter t = chair eligible to vote only to make or break a tie --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun May 3 23:59:47 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 04 2009 - 00:02:53 PDT