[sv-ac] RE: Proposals posted for Mantis 2650 and 2652

I do not see that in the mantis that it asks motivating using past gclk functions, but as you wish.
ed

From: Seligman, Erik [mailto:erik.seligman@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 1:08 PM
To: Eduard Cerny; Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: RE: Proposals posted for Mantis 2650 and 2652

Well, the ballot issue was specifically about motivating future value functions vs the past ones.  So I think it's better to strictly make this example past vs future instead of complicating it with comparisons to stuff from other sections.

________________________________
From: Eduard Cerny [mailto:Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 9:57 AM
To: Seligman, Erik; Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: RE: Proposals posted for Mantis 2650 and 2652

Hi Erik,

for 2652, it might be better to use $stable(sig, $global_clock) instead of the gclk function $stable_gclk(sig). It woud tie better to the regular sampled value functions.

Best regards,
ed


From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Seligman, Erik
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 12:42 PM
To: Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] Proposals posted for Mantis 2650 and 2652

http://www.verilog.org/mantis/view.php?id=2650
http://www.verilog.org/mantis/view.php?id=2652

These are pretty simple edits; please take a look & tell me ASAP if something needs to be changed.
Otherwise, Dmitry will call an email vote when he gets back from the holiday on Thurs.



--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.